my late night thots no one asked for are that richard and amsha bashir truly loved julian and did what they did out of a deeply fearful, anxious love born from living in a technotopia where people who get to do the coolest things have to be super smart and brainy in a very narrowly defined way. furthermore the fact that they wanted to enhance his genes speaks to a deep sense of shame and self-hate within both of them (and we can speculate how this shows up but, for one thing, it’s clear there’s a class difference between amsha and richard and that richard is constantly trying to measure up to his perceived lack and hurting people in the process) that deserves more nuancing in fic, especially when we consider how the “eugenics wars” were concentrated in the global south and therefore most likely impacted the regions richard and amsha hailed from. 

and finally, if we factor in richard’s inferiority complex about his class and race and masculinity with amsha’s pained grace and regretful acquiescence we can see why julian dons a mantle of snobbery and hauteur in order to project self-assuredness (like richard) while keenly aware that he’s wrong/imperfect/guilty (like amsha), and how all of that is also tangled up with the shame he feels about not being good enough without his augmentations, while also resenting the fact that his parents both gifted and cursed him with these talents.

tldr; the bashir family story is often contextualized through ableism and parental homo/transphobia but, imho, only fully makes sense with an intersecting racial and class framework. ableism and homophobia can’t be decoupled from race (the history of european race science is the easiest example of how race was long used as a shorthand for intellectual deficiency) and, in the case of these three characters, what we see unfold onscreen is just as much a story of immigrant/model minority transgenerational trauma as it is a story of how ableism and homophobia damages parent/child relationships. richard and amsha are also, in their own way, responding to ableism, is what i’m suggesting. and their love for julian is always shot through with their own self-loathing and anxieties around failing societal expectations. 

Very much this.

Especially in the 90s, Amsha’s lines about Julian’s condition being her fault were important. There is so much blame placed on pregnant people when their children are born with any kind of disability, and so much harm comes as a consequence of it.

And showing Amsha feeling that shame, expressing it, explaining how it led her to try and “fix” the perceived harm she thought she’d caused, and then letting us see that it wasn’t the right call?

That it caused harm anyway?

I think that was more nuanced than I’ve seen from that time.

  1. kino-verite reblogged this from irresistible-revolution
  2. scrollgirl reblogged this from judiops
  3. nerdy-flower reblogged this from irresistible-revolution
  4. bethsmash reblogged this from johannestevans
  5. femmeboyant reblogged this from johannestevans
  6. johannestevans reblogged this from irresistible-revolution
  7. elizaisthetruehero reblogged this from thebreakfastgenie
  8. thebreakfastgenie reblogged this from stillfiguringitout280
  9. irresistible-revolution said: @di-goldene-oygn same same, always thinking about that
  10. stillfiguringitout280 reblogged this from irresistible-revolution
  11. amarocit said: Still thinking about that discussion we had re Section 31 plants in support groups for parents of disabled children
  12. irresistible-revolution reblogged this from judiops
  13. kagenightray reblogged this from journalistpeterparker
  14. journalistpeterparker reblogged this from irresistible-revolution